ASA logo
The Game of Social Life: A Multidimensional Poverty Simulation
Cover Page
Requires Subscription DOCX

Keywords

inequalities
poverty
social stratification
privilege
oppression
victim blaming
meritocracy
wealth distribution
active learning
student engagement
gamification
simulation
board game

How to Cite

Bramesfeld, Kosha. 2015. “The Game of Social Life: A Multidimensional Poverty Simulation”. TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology, February. Washington DC: American Sociological Association. https://trails.asanet.org/article/view/the-game-of-social-life-a-multidimensional-poverty.

Abstract

Understanding structural factors in social life is one of the top learning goals of a course in sociology (Persell 2010). Still, students often react defensively to discussions about structural inequality (Davis 1992; Watt 2007). Simulation activities may be a means of creating a safe environment for engaging people in these dialogues (Dorn 1989). This...

Download this resource to see full details. Download this resource to see full details.

Details

Subject Area(s):
Stratification/Mobility
Resource Type(s):
Class Activity
Class Level(s):
Any Level
Class Size(s):
Small

Usage Notes

The Game of Social Life is a poverty simulation board game designed for use in small group settings. It is ideal for environments in which there are fewer than 30 players per facilitator. Room space and configuration is required for participants to play the board game. The room should be set up with tables or desks pushed together so that there is room to...

Download this resource to see full details. Download this resource to see full details.

Learning Goals and Assessments

Learning Goal(s):

  1. Describe structural factors that contribute to poverty.
  2. Question assumptions of meritocracy and individualistic explanations for poverty
  3. Evaluate the role of economic privilege in one’s own life and in one’s own society

Goal Assessment(s):

  1. Responses during a written reflection assignment and/or students’ verbal responses during the guided discussion can be used to assess students’ ability to describe structural factors that contribute to poverty.
  2. Responses during a written reflection assignment and/or students’ verbal responses during the guided discussion can be used to assess students’ ability to question assumptions of meritocracy and individualistic explanations for poverty.
  3. Responses during a written reflection assignment and/or students’ verbal responses during the guided discussion can be used to assess students’ ability to evaluate the role of economic privilege in one’s own life.

When using resources from TRAILS, please include a clear and legible citation.

Cover Page
Requires Subscription DOCX

Our website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, to increase the speed and security for the site, to provide analytics about our site and visitors, and for marketing. By proceeding to the site, you are expressing your consent to the use of cookies. To find out more about how we use cookies, see our Privacy Policy .