ASA logo
First Day of Criminology: A Group Activity on Thinking about Theories of Crime
Cover Page
Requires Subscription DOCX

Keywords

Criminology
Theories of Crime

How to Cite

Zito, Rena. 2014. “First Day of Criminology: A Group Activity on Thinking about Theories of Crime”. TRAILS: Teaching Resources and Innovations Library for Sociology, July. Washington DC: American Sociological Association. https://trails.asanet.org/article/view/first-day-of-criminology-a-group-activity-on.

Abstract

This in-class group activity is designed for the first day of class in a Criminology course, though it can also be used later as theories of crime are introduced. The goals of the activity are (1) to help students appreciate that the answers to our questions about the causes of crime depend on the questions we ask, (2) to gently introduce the concept of...

Download this resource to see full details. Download this resource to see full details.

Details

Subject Area(s):
Criminology/Delinquency
Resource Type(s):
Class Activity
Class Level(s):
Any Level
Class Size(s):
Any

Usage Notes

Time required: Approximately one hour if using two types of crime (shoplifting and homicide). Can be made shorter if only one type is used.

Materials needed: Numbered slips of paper with one question per slip (enough for each student to have one slip/question—see below); chalkboard or dry-erase board with at least six writing implements (or...

Download this resource to see full details. Download this resource to see full details.

Learning Goals and Assessments

Learning Goal(s):

  1. Devise an explanation for a presented crime pattern, and apply that explanation to devise crime policies.
  2. Develop and demonstrate appreciation that explanations of crime depend on how we frame questions about crime.
  3. Investigate assumptions about human behavior that are embodied within devised explanations of crime.

Goal Assessment(s):

  1. Writes down explanation individually, followed by a pair/group comparison of explanations and recording of explanations on the board; group and full-class discussions of relevant policies.
  2. Full-class comparison of explanations written on the board. Group discussion of how the framing of questions shapes the explanation each group devised.
  3. Full-class discussion of assumptions about human behavior in each explanation on the board; responses to challenges regarding proper application of explanation to crime policies.

When using resources from TRAILS, please include a clear and legible citation.

Cover Page
Requires Subscription DOCX

Our website uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, to increase the speed and security for the site, to provide analytics about our site and visitors, and for marketing. By proceeding to the site, you are expressing your consent to the use of cookies. To find out more about how we use cookies, see our Privacy Policy .